HR 4269; a Response

guilford.gif

To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.

To all concerned with this Bill,

I write not to ask of you to somehow decide upon infringement of my God-given rights; that consent is given only between myself and the Lord. You seek power which you do not possess, Lordship over man which cannot be granted only through consent of the governed.

Allow me to clarify- Government is based upon social contract. Laws are obeyed of convenience, and at such time as to become overbearing or cumbersome, recourse must be taken to ensure that freedom for us and our progeny.

Laws which infringe upon personal Liberties are, without exception, guised as reactions to some sort of crisis- which according to the authors, would prevent such atrocities. In every case, without exception, nothing is prevented aside from the stifling of opposition and true Liberty.

The crisis in our time is a result not of a free people possessing and bearing arms as a result of personal Liberty, but rather, an influx of those who respect neither the value of the individual nor the Western values of which our society is based upon. Those values, which have been watered down and castigated in the Marxist-inspired public school systems, are the very saving grace of our society. Instead, we are served with blame, shame of who we are, and a cultural replacement at every corner. This permeates our government at every step where the inability to place blame for such incidents resides.

The invaders of our culture seek not to integrate; rather they seek to destroy that which they cannot understand. Marxism cannot understand the will of the Individual, it forbids it and cannot function with it; Islam cannot function where Righteous Liberty is allowed to exist- its very name means “Submission before Allah”. Kept to their own, they pose little threat, however neither ideology can be contained among its purveyors. Both must be proselytized in order for its adherents to truly follow its tenants. It must be remembered that under both, the most egregious crimes against humanity have been not only allowed to occur but encouraged.

The solution to such issues is never more centralized control but rather more freedom; such cultural destruction cannot exist where a free people will not allow it. Such a response negates the need for Government, and thus, is never a popular option among those who seek control. In those efforts, those whom you seek to control will indeed revolt, every time, without fail, as has been proven in every instance in history. An oppressed people will not remain so willingly, and in time where the will overcomes the means to control, those people will win.

At this point in our history, many in the American Political Class seem to be incapable of understanding the rise of such contrarian candidates; the sides are becoming ever more galvanized. This is a dire warning which must be heeded- the next step as history demonstrates, is particularly violent against the perceived oppressor. It begins with a decision, to further infringe or assert Liberty; a tipping point to which the consequences very well may mean Liberty or Death.

I write to ask of you to consider and beware. A free and tolerant people to which this country has been blessed will only bear the burden for so long. Such language of a law as quoted above cannot and will not stand among a free people. Serious men wait patiently to view the resolve of those seeking control. These Men have great experience in War and are masters of replicating Men of their equal. These Men of experience do not want this, but will fight and win when pushed. May God bless you, and Long Live the Republic.

frenchrev.jpg

Sic semper evello mortem Tyrannis

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “HR 4269; a Response

  1. Pingback: Brushbeater Nails It. | Mason Dixon Tactical

  2. Pingback: HR 4269; a Response | Rifleman III Journal

  3. Pingback: Brushbeater Nails It. | Prepper's Survival Homestead

  4. I’m with you BB, a most proper appeal to Heaven.
    I think tolerance out of plain old fashioned good will has a lot to do with it all. It is very important to put up with much, it is dignity of liberty in action, the motive power of liberty, which is indomitable. It is a reflection of sovereign will and self determination. On the other hand the gun grabbers are going to be sticking their dicks in a meat grinder trying to implement their final ideas. It is one thing to meddle in our affairs, undermine freedoms involving ones income, medical related needs, privacy, speech, unfettered economy, and other components of liberty. Regardless of how distasteful and onerous they are, there are ways to work around them, in rebellion and resistance, without resorting to bloody lethal means of redress. Just refusing to comply is honorable resistance, at its finest. Most of us do resist to one degree or another, and we give the fuckers the finger by refusing to comply and consent, rightfully and properly so. That is just about a daily duty these days for all freemen. But for the sonofabitches to actually TAKE something which is a mans property, his rifle, for it is to begin with actual physical hold in your hands real property, never mind it is a gun, that to take it out of someones hands is quite another thing entirely. Especially if it is something that can be aimed and fired at those attempting to steal it from you.
    These promises and acts of Obama’s of disarmament of America is the nadir of the cultural marxists and their human extinction movement.
    They are just to fucking stupid to understand it.
    That My rifle is the fulcrum of my liberty.

    I’m at the had enough of this bullshit point.
    Want my rifle you fuckers? Lets get this party going then. Want to make an example out of someone. Come on. I’m waiting.
    Let’s get it out in the open and settle who and what is legitimate and what is just plain fucking stupid and wrong.
    I’ll be damned in hell before I’m judged by God if I let another guy die for my Liberty.

    Habitas Libertatem Aut Mori

    Liked by 1 person

  5. shocktroop0351

    If they couldn’t get the law passed after the emotional aftermath of Sandy Hook, why would they try and do it now? I think it is a sign of desperation, and I think the only way to get the general population to support it without an emotional catalyst would be to get them to see gun owners in a very negative light. And the only way to get the average American to support confiscation would be to convince people that gun owners are a bigger threat than ISIS or other extremists. There are bigger boogeymen in the average joe’s world now than there was 3 years ago. Like I said, they are desperate. They couldn’t get it done in the open, so now they are going to try some midnight deal. As far as I am concerned that will be a complete waste of their time, because nobody will pay any attention to it.

    Like

    1. It may be, but as Matt Bracken and others have pointed out, this President has a history of not caring for the Law of the Land and usurping current events. He’s also a firm believer in “if at first you don’t succeed, lie again because they don’t believe you enough…”
      The Country of Today very well may not be the Country of Tomorrow.

      Like

    2. mtnforge

      I smell the same rat you do 351. Something is up with the regime and how they are projecting their efforts at disarmament. Sometimes it has the odor of a coup via crisis as a means. And by that I’m saying the distinct possibility of causing peoples reason for violent resistance to gun grabbing to provide the regime appearance of justifying declaration of Martial Law. It is a perfect foil to rescind all the constitutional and moral obstacles, not to mention the “optics”, blocking the path of completing the long march. It would be a heady and ironic conclusion for cultural marxists to end this Republic via the use of the mechanism of the presidents powers granted within the constitution upon declaring Martial Law. Remember obama projected his desire, publicly, of a 3rd term earlier this year. That was cultural marxist signaling if I ever saw it.
      You have to consider the context here, the motives beyond just ideology and power, there is the imperative of corruption. And always plan B, and C and so on. Like “Elections have consequences”. Think about it, the corruption involved in this regime and its corporate and banking associations. It is the largest crime syndicate in human history. Aside from the fact those involved aren’t about to just give up and walk away from the cash cow formally known as The United States, is it a reasonable assumption those involved are going to allow their corruption and avarice to be exposed due to the possibility of revelations if an minutely lawfully and morally principled administration was to obtain the white house?
      These people are serious crooks, its an oligarchy on crank. And crooks only stop when they are stopped.
      Then we have another strange situation here. The democratic ticket has as its front runner an insipid dynastic crowned crone in waiting. A terribly corrupt nasty little psychopath in a pantsuit. A very dangerous one, soaked in blood. After the ordained coronation of the Won and fundamental transformation, is this all they have? Something don’t add up here. I believe the only way the Clintons assume the crown again is via massive vote rigging and gerrymandering on a scale unprecedented.
      Are these sonofabitches betting their hordes of gold and influence on this nasty little piece of human trash?
      Something doesn’t add up here. It is almost like they are going through the motions for appearances sake.
      My instincts tell me something is afoot, and it really stinks. Telling me Martial Law is the way it is going down. Import thousands of jihad soldiers, divide everyone culturally, racially, by class, pillage and bankrupt America, strip mine our industry, intellectual property, impoverish its middle class, militarize its police, impose cultural cleansing, destroy free speech, make everyone outside the regime a criminal, set the jihad loose across the countryside, and go after just enough guns to get the countryside literally up in arms, make enough useful dupes terrified and presto you have all the appearance of legitimacy required to declare Martial Law. Martial Law is rescinded only upon the best of the president once imposed. It gives the president unlimited powers to rescind every branch of government, provides sole singularly unlimited powers over every aspect of this nation. Including how the military is employed.
      Nothing else has restricted these psychopaths from imposing and implementing anything. Except our guns and the existential threat to the bastards our collective will represents.
      How else is civilian disarmament possible? There just inset enough people within the regime, nor the resources or physical power to disarm the people of America, without employing the military as enforcers. And I think it is justifiable to contend the remaining shreds of the USC has to be cast aside to do so.

      For me, I have no need or use of the USC or Bill of Rights. My Liberty is God granted and primal. That piece of parchment is nothing but an instrument of administrative tyranny, it was a huge mistake, leading directly to the tyranny breathing down our throats.
      But it sure has been a handy instrument destruction for the Fabian bastards, they have hid behind it and employed it as a screen since its ratification. The declaration of Martial Law would be the fitting grand finally for their long march.

      I think they are in for a very rude awakening.
      It will be their undoing.

      Like

      1. Shocktroop0351

        I completely agree, there is no way this will work for them without some major changes to the sheeple’s habitat. And there are certainly many ways to do it. I also think they are in for a rude awakening, because in my opinion, majority of the “conservatives” in this country have not been awoken like most in the liberty movement. They are still worried about “R’s” and “D’s”. It reminds me of an article about the black hats and the white hats (It may have been written by T.L. Davis but I can’t find it now) where basically white hats were people who believed that voting in the right person would change everything, and black hats were people who had given up on that idea and decided to start preparing for changes. I think the vast majority of our “conservatives” in this country are white hats. And if the powers that be were smart they would keep them that way. The black hats are certainly in the minority, and so it is easy to make them seem extreme. By passing unnecessary laws and punishing people who haven’t done anything wrong, they will certainly create more black hats. And with the economy and internal and external strife between races and classes and other countries, I don’t think it will take much to make that many more black hats. Tell a 17 year old kid that he has no future and that the powers that be are to blame for ruining the country that his ancestors built for him, and you’ll have an instant black hat. Hell, he will be a black hat before he is old enough to get suckered into our voting system and become a white hat. (” Serious men wait patiently to view the resolve of those seeking control. These Men have great experience in War and are masters of replicating Men of their equal.”) The cultural marxist’s are already doing it with all this blame the white guy stuff. So there is definitely something afoot here, it is almost as if they want to quietly get the law into place, and then spring it into action as soon as there is an emotional stimulus for the average American to get behind. And once that snowball gets rolling, it will be hard to stop once they realize what their emotion based decisions have done. And at that point is when we have been completely derailed. I personally think that is the opportunity that the liberty movement needs to finally grab main stream attention, and there will be no denying the path that got us here and who, or better yet, what ideas are to blame. You can kill 1,000’s of followers, but if you don’t kill the idea, or better yet let it kill itself, it will continue to spread. Look at communism. I would be curious to know how many elderly Ukrainians sit around at coffee and bitch about the weather and lament on the good old days of Soviet rule. Probably won’t be seeing too much of that, that idea killed itself. Figuratively, all we will have to do is hold up a mirror and show America how much of a drunken whore she has turned into and who the enablers were that helped her along. Maybe then the average person will wake up and decide to do something, after all, who wants to put up selfies when your starving?

        Like

  6. Pingback: VIDEO Responses To MB Obama Disarm USA, Appease And Empower ISIS | Reclaim Our Republic

  7. mtnforge

    Well what your saying I couldn’t hold a more similar view with you. Indeed, there is no voting our way out of this. That was a really good piece TL wrote, (back at the end of his Constitutionalist stage if memory serves). Quite a guy TL is. john jay of Winter Soldier Summer Patriot blog wrote a piece called The Totalitarians Among Us, as I’m sure you can hazard a guess what that is about. You heard of Henry Dampier? He wrote a masterpiece on the black/white hat dynamic: The Corporate Slave Class http://www.henrydampier.com/2015/04/about-the-corporate-slave-class/
    There are some sublime insights in that essay.

    They play a dangerous game. To fundamentally change a republic of people, not the state, is matter of pecking away at its foundations and culture slowly. And the white hats have something in common which defines them and how they conduct themselves, they are afraid of change which disrupts them radically, more so the unknowns of venturing freedom. It is choice really. Liberty isn’t a comfortable lifestyle to the white hats. It is always a risky action, you got take risks if your gonna be free.

    The cultural marxist are cunning, they are boiling the frog here. They are cooking the “I Won’t!” right out of people who are afraid and that is security to them no matter the illusion.
    Like you said, make as many afraid as practical, then you can go after those not afraid.
    It keeps returning to those darn guns no matter how you peruse it. Funny that. The rifle is the great dynamic. Thing is we have rifles, as Andrew Brietbart said “…we have guns”, or more pertinent, we don’t not have them.

    Samuel Adams had a very good point,
    “It does not take a majority to prevail… but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.”
    Add rifles and the will to use them and his axiom is a plurality which has the motive power to change the world. Our history proves that is possible. It is almost a guideline for how to win 4gw, its “Auftragstaktik”.

    For many it is also difficult to think of liberty when your starving, too busy living hand to mouth or on the dole and the money runs out. It is certainly a great dynamic a great many aren’t the Christian rugged men and women of two centuries ago. Self reliance and individualism is a trait purposefully being bred out of our culture. I’m not being pessimistic, because I think you don’t need a country full of Patrick Henry’s to win, you only need a tiny plurality of people who will never bend a knee and then you win. Regardless of, or in some ways, or maybe, because of the white hats.

    Cultural marxists, the whole kittenkaboodle of Fabianism, is essentially a human extinction movement. At some point here, betting it won’t be long, lot of reckoning is coming, the kind of self reckoning that become sea changes. The white hats are gonna white hat. They will die in place regardless of events. The black hats are always a minority, but a minority with motive power far outside their stature, it is no easy task deny and extinguish them, because the core even when they are killed for refusing to comply are still free, which makes it impossible to eradicate liberty. I have a little theory on that score, pretty simple, us discussing it proves that theory, the cat got out of the bag liberty, can’t put the cat back, in fact, trying to destroy our liberty is like stuffing spaghetti up a wild cat’s arse in a phone booth. very difficult. And the closer the fuckers get to destroying liberty, the level of difficulty rises on a logarithmic scale.

    The million dollar question is all the gray hats. They come in every flavor imaginable. The only real silent majority that ever existed in this country. Within those millions, is a couple who are going to rise to the occasion, out of all proportion to their diminutive status, and they will define what happens. Everything we thought was going to happen, I’m saying everyone, will change. It will be something that seems inconsequential to the larger scope of things, but it is they who will redefine the dynamic.
    That is the nature of us, it is who we are that this is even possible. It is why they fuckers want to destroy us. They hate that about us. It can’t be regulated, it can’t be taxed, it can’t be controlled, and it can’t be killed, it is our God blessed destiny.
    And our guns and the will that exists to use them in our defense represents it all. That has always been the One Thing. The One Thing that defies all the tyranny. It is so powerful this One Thing it is the most powerful weapon ever devised.
    Mind Your Own Business.

    Like

  8. Shocktroop0351

    Great points Mtnforge, I appreciate the external links to other writings, ideas are constantly evolving things, and I love to refine my own ideas by analyzing things through other people’s writings. I think you are dead on about the “gray hats”. That was the idea I was trying to convey in my last reply. The silent majority that the marxists’ cannot afford to alienate, and then motivate. I think it is also ironic that all this fluff about an executive order, basically came down to nothing. He issued some orders, but they are so inconsequential to the average person that they won’t even be noticed, let alone followed. Feel free to correct me if you see things differently. But I think the “fanfare” given to the executive orders, followed by the real lack of impact of them, goes to show that the paper tiger is starting to understand just how fragile things are, and just how limited their power really is. To be honest I think they are starting to understand the true facts of life. You can dictate all you want, but only if people listen. I think they also understand that they have squeezed all the gun control out of the bill of rights that they are going to get. The timing of this whole EO thing was completely off, that’s what threw me for a loop to begin with. There was no need for it, and there was no emotional catalyst to spur it along. And luckily, none was provided. To be honest, I think we are beginning to see what I have seen referred to as “Thermidor” begin to take place. The marxists’ have begun to over extend themselves and have missed the opportunities needed to cement their ideas permanently. Not to say they haven’t made a mess of things, and not to say that there isn’t a lot of work that needs to be done. But I think like you said, the cat’s out of the bag, not just on liberty, but on their bullshit. The only people buying their bullshit are the FSA and those who would lose power. They have failed to convince the white and gray hats that giving up their liberty is better than keeping it. That being a poor vassal unable to change his life is better than the alternative. I think as time goes on, you will see the marxists become more desperate, and as they become more desperate they will get more off balance, and it will be harder for them to uphold the veil of having Americans’ best interest at heart. And as that happens, I think you will see more and more bolder action by the Bundy’s of the country.

    Like

Comments are closed.