USMC Field Antenna Handbook

usmc

mcrp3-403c

By request, an extremely valuable resource, one that rarely left my ruck as an RTO. Now you have no excuse not to print out a copy and have the knowledge too.

Advertisements

43 thoughts on “USMC Field Antenna Handbook

  1. Pingback: Brushbeater: USMC Antenna Manual | Western Rifle Shooters Association

    1. I’ve used it consistently over the years for a reason.

      Although in terms of overall ease of use, the commo section of FM7-93 is superior. But that handbook didn’t get carried because A) it’s like 6in thick and B) if captured, it PIDs your unit/role.

      Like

      1. The VX-7R has been discontinued for a while now. I recommended it because it’s the best, most durable radio Yaesu made, and it offers the most bang for the buck. They’re easy to find used.

        The VX-6 is still in production, uses the same battery, but doesn’t have the dual VFO. There’s a couple minor differences, but it’s a durable little HT too.

        The MFJ set you linked is SSB only, so no FM and no repeaters, and it only tunes the SSB portion of the 2m band. Personally, unless that’s your thing, I wouldn’t bother, and it’s very expensive for what it is.

        MFJ is nicknamed ‘mighty fine junk’, BTW. Well-made is a far stretch.

        Like

    1. keypounder

      NC SCout recommends the Yaesu VX-7, and it is a good unit. I would not be unhappy with that unit; Its a good piece of gear, but after considerable review I decided on the Kenwood TH- F6A. Some of the reasons why are:
      Multiband RX;
      Multimode RX;
      5 watts output on all three bands (2m, 1 1/4, and 70 cm);
      Moisture, dust and impact resistant;
      Still in production (warranty);
      Allows very low power transmission;
      Easy support for AA batteries.

      I’ve used this unit to DF folks causing deliberate interference on local repeaters as well as to receive SW broadcasts, as a satcom receiver in conjunction with my ft817, for receiving AM and FM broadcasts, and to listen to airband, public service and other transmissions.

      Keypounder

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Dr. Who

    Speaking of antenna’s… do you think there would be any problems with putting a diepole on top of a lanai in an inverted vee configuration? The lanai is aluminum and I’ve got HOA issues when it comes to antenna’s.
    And thanks for the manual!!! Just printed it up!

    Doc

    Liked by 1 person

      1. keypounder

        It will make a GREAT ground plane/ counterpoise for either HF or VHF. Long ago, I put a 5 band HF vertical on the peak of a galvanized steel roof. It got out very well indeed.

        As regards feeding a dipole above one, you will have impedance matching issues if you get too close. I’d stay at least 1/10 wavelength away.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Donk

    Thanks for the link and I have two semi-related questions;

    1) I have a very large collection of similar .PDFs covering a plethora of survival related topics. Printing hard copies would be daunting. What is your opinion of storing same on flash drives for viewing with a Netbook (or similar) all stored in a Faraday cage.
    2) I read an article you had posted a while back regarding does everyone need a HAM license for WROL situation. I decided listening was more important for me than talking (even though I have a variety of secure short range devices; Motorola DTRs and i355s, etc.) and sold my ICOM 703+ and antenna. I have Grundig G3 shortwave radios, a HomePatrol scanner and an ICOM R5 analog scanner. Are these sufficient for listening to HF comms and would I need to make my own antennas for receiving certain freqs?

    Sorry to be such a noob but perhaps your answers will help other noobs.

    PS, I am not name dropping brands or bling bragging, I just list them for the other noobs for consideration based on my research of blogs and forums like yours for NPT comms.

    Donk

    Liked by 1 person

    1. 1. Nothing replaces ink and paper.
      2. If you don’t see the need for regional communications, and many don’t, then what you’ve currently got covers the essentials. I would however pick up a couple Baofengs to use as cheap Bubba detectors.

      Never fear asking any questions, it’s why I run this blog.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Donk

    Thanks for the reply but I am still confused. Although I have ICOM IC-V8s and have listened in to local HAM rag chewing sessions in the past using a slim jim roll up j-pole, I guess I thought the shortwave radios and the ICOM IC-R5 covered the HF spectrum too. I am not opposed to picking up the BaoFengs and will likely pickup a CB for Bubba detection, as well. Oh, and another VHF radio for the noobs to investigate is the ICOM IC-F3 and variants. Nice MURS radios, relatively inexpensive on eBay, programming software and cables are available for those so inclined and I have bought them new from a vendor I found on the web who actually programmed them in MURS freqs for me.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Donk

        Thanks bro. The Grundig G3s have SSB reception. The R5 also have a very broad reception range. I bought the R5 based on recommendation of DanMorgan76 https://danmorgan76.wordpress.com/

        That said, you are the resident expert and why I am asking you questions regarding comms and you are not asking me questions regarding hydraulics, machining, 3D printing, diesel mechanics and welding. I will look into your suggestion wrt County Comm.

        This whole liberty community mindshare is totally cool. Old school trade dittos and thanks for what you do. I travel through NC often, maybe I can buy you lunch some day.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. The R5 is a very good receiver, within the parameters it was designed for. I talk a little bit about it, and it’s competitor, the AOR AR-mini in the “signals intelligence resources” page up top.

        Don’t feel undergunned- it’s a very good receiver. And the County Comm unit is relatively cheap.

        Email me on the trip.

        Like

  5. Old Grey Guy

    Thanks for the link. I have the Army TM11-666 Antenna and Propagation book in original paper. (1950’s) I haven’t had time to compare them. It is available on the web I have found it but I don’t remember where. Antennas are fascinating. I am still learning after 58 years as a ham and RF engineer.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Backwoodsman

    Would the 22D or the 403C version be better. I am looking to get a hard copy for the field and am wondering if one would be better than the other due to newer material or concepts. Thanks for the blog, I have learned a lot from here and other links that you have posted.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I’m really not sure to be honest. I’ve only known of the one I have, spiral bound and small.

      There may be a few updates on equipment terminology (like radio sets in use at the time of writing) but I can’t imagine the concepts being any different.

      Like

  7. Pingback: USMC Field Antenna Handbook | Oath Keepers Nebraska

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s