Getting a Correct (and useful!) Zero on Your Rifle

In many of the discussions I’ve had with both like-minded and comparably-experienced folks, including some in my inner-circle, the topic of LRM comes up with usually two platforms in mind; the AR in 5.56 and a Bolt gun, commonly in 308 (7.62×51). To a man, we recognize the distinct advantage of the rifleman, not only from the discipline being the hallmark of a warrior but also that we can reclaim that Infantryman’s Half-Kilometer and with it provide an advantage over the OPFOR like none other. Paramount to that capability is understanding your zero and not only how to correctly perform it, but keep it in unpredictable conditions.

Obtaining the correct zero on your rifle is frequently the most misunderstood element of riflecraft, with the utility of a sling slightly behind. A zero is the correction of your point of aim (POA) to your point of impact (POI). This changes according to distance of shot, bullet weight and charge, and environmental conditions. Our article will deal with the basics surrounding the first and how it can be affected by the second. The first issue to resolve is the fundamentals of good marksmanship, second is the actual distance of zero, third is understanding the mechanics of the action and conditions of which you’ve zeroed your weapon. They each make a tremendous amount of difference in both being able to zero and shooting your rifle true. A misunderstanding of any of these potential issues will cause a frustrating day at the range or a missed shot when it counts. For example, I don’t often comment on other blogs but this question was sent in my direction for guidance:

Serious question here for those that know. I’m not any kind of mil. Retired fireman medic. Shooting since i was 7 or so. Taught by my grandpa back in the day. Only formal shooting instruction was 2 yrs ago at an appleseed event. Shot a 216 and got my rifleman patch at that event.
My question is this. If i zero my rifle on a bench, then go prone, why is it off? I did that with 3 rifles and they were all spot on from the bench, but all shot the same amount low from prone. I have gone thru all the handouts i got and dont remember anything from the course except zero from prone . Its always the most accurate. Prone is hard for me due to a back injury , but fuckit. Aint gonna have a bench in the festivities. Ive been shooting kneeling and prone only now. No pain. No gain. Just wondering why such a difference in my zero.

With my original reply:

The bedding of the stock meeting the rest caused the shift on the M14/M1A. The handguard caused the shift on the AR platforms. This is why we freefloat actions as much as possible by either glassbedding the Garand action or using any of the common [accurizing, more commonly known as freefloat] tubes for the AR. This is why DMRs and Snipers make sandsocks as an improvised rest. Mine never wanders far.

When you zero do it from the prone, supported from that sandsock just behind the sling swivel. It’ll have the least impact on your dope. Zero at 100m.

Let’s explain a bit and expound.

Fundamentals

BRAS.jpgThe fundamentals of proper marksmanship, Breathe, Relax, Aim, Squeeze- not tap/rack/bang, bang, bang till you hit something – are the cornerstone of what you should be working on each and every time you hit the square range. In fact, that should be all you’re doing until you have it mastered. Consistency is the key. Body alignment and sight picture are corrected through focusing on these fundamentals, because no BRAS-2matter what you’re doing as long as its the exact same everytime and gets those rounds on target, then it’s not wrong. But what I will say about this is that just like a golf swing, the proper technique needs to be taught by those that know what they’re doing, or you’ll never actually be able to diagnose those minor problems with the fundamentals that even well-seasoned shooters have.

Distance of Zero

25M ZeroThis is the biggest point of contention when it comes to a solid zero- traditional thinking says that one needs to zero at a closer distance, usually 25m to account for the rise in bullet trajectory up close to match that of the drop further out, common knowledge being 375m when talking about the 5.56 AR-15. For iron sights and red dot optics, this is the preferred method along with the associated points of aim in the illustration above. ta-01But for an optic with a Bullet Drop Compensator (BDC) or Mil-Dots of any variety, different distance zeroes are usually required. For some of the more common reticles out there, such as the ACOG TA-01 and TA-31, the Burris AR and MTAC series BDCs and the excellent Primary Arms ACSS reticle (which will be covered in a post of it’s own in the near-future), they each have a specific distance zero to function. Most of the time this is 100m.

acog_bullet_303190345_stdHere’s another problem with BDCs, albeit a minor one. Along with being tailored to a distance, they’re usually also tailored to a specific (or average thereof) loading. The shooter must know the bullet weight and speed in addition to just the caliber and barrel length and twist they’re shooting. 55gr M193 has a slightly different trajectory than 62gr M855, which has a different trajectory from 77gr OTM. The ACOG TA-31, for example, are tailored for 62gr M855 from the 14.5in M4 barrel. Each loading data is slightly different, with 308 having a fairly wide trajectory margin between those possible loadings due to a large variance in the bullet weights and types available, the most common usually being 147gr M80 Ball. For example, a 1/7 twist rate will be different from a 1/8 or 1/9 in 223 or 5.56. 1/10 is gonna be different from 1/11.25 or 1/12 in 308 or 7.62×51. Barrel length is yet another variable affecting velocity. And since it’s all based on averages, there’s no replacement for actually confirming that Data On Previous Engagement (DOPE), by actually putting rounds on target at 200, 300, and beyond, preferably training with someone who knows what they’re doing.

ACSS.png
The excellent ACSS reticle from Primary Arms

Confused? Don’t be. Just go shoot and confirm the impact of rounds at those ranges. That said, I like BDC reticles for many reasons, mainly due to convenience and the speed at which I can train someone on their use. I just confirm the actual points of impact for each of the stadia lines with the round I’m running. Along with the very fast rangefinding method built into both the ACOG (seen above) and the ACSS (seen left) a rifleman can rapidly range his targets when completely exhausted and not always able to think.

Let’s pause for a little fieldcraft professional development- the first thing any Scout or Sniper does once the hide is emplaced is range off the Target Reference Points (TRPs)

IMG_0886
A rough sector sketch range card from an urban hide. Above is a drawing of my sector. All numbers are in Meters.
IMG_0887
The rear of the above range card, with basic necessary reporting information.

so that he knows the relative distance of everything within his Field Of View (FOV). These are a requirement for every fixed position. TRPs are simply big objects that you can’t miss, like a building, a door, the intersection of a road you’re watching or that huge century oak just to the left of it. The schoolhouse answer is to write it all down on a range card, which is a printed piece of paper that you’d carry on a small clipboard in a ziploc bag. In my experience paper turns to mush from the sweat you put out during a movement to the hide, and the actual range card even when laminated gets kinda convoluted after a couple days of little sleep and silent boredom. I have an easier method. Carry a few pieces of thick cardboard. Draw a rough picture of the lay of the land, exactly as you see it. Write in the distance in meters above each item. Do it all in permanent marker- they don’t run and they write on most surfaces damp or dry. It also writes big and easy to see, so that anyone can read my chicken scratch. What does this have to do with zeroing a rifle? If you know the engagement range of your target and the impact data of your weapon, you’re combat effective. The rangfinding reticle of a mil-dot or BDC-type reticle from above enables you to do just that rapidly and simply. Alright, PD over, let’s get back on track.

Mechanics of the Action and Zeroing Conditions

barrel.png
A drawing of a harmonic stabilizer on a bolt action. The perforated line represents the meeting of the stock and the barrel. The stabilizer is designed to minimize the impact of the stock upon the barrel.

As a round travels down the tube, the barrel itself flexes.  Anything touching that barrel impedes this natural process. Further, those things touching the barrel have a slight to major impact on the POI versus the POA. For this reason the most accurate actions are free-floated and/or glass bedded to attain the best accuracy possible. This is very simple and a standard upgrade for any bolt action. For an AR-15, the closest you can get to a freefloat is one of the hundreds of handguard tubes on the market, and the longer the better for accuracy’s sake when shooting from improvised rests. Anything you place under the handguard will have little impact on the barrel, keeping your zero true. For the Garand action/M1A/M14, imperfections in the original stock or warping from moisture causes shifts in zero, which is the big reason the Ordinance Dept. got away from wood stocks (and you should too). Glass bedding provides a perfect smooth surface along with a more precise fitment of the stock to the action. barrel harmonics.pngIt’s also important to note, like I did in the original excerpt above, that the Garand action is least affected by the use of a rest if the forward rest is placed just behind the sling swivel. There’s a little more material behind the swivel due to the stock taper so it has less impact on the barrel and shifting the gas piston beneath it.

On that note, let’s address the mechanics of our zero. In order to have a true zero, we have to eliminate as many impacts on the action as possible. Zeroing from a sled or bench rest is nice for testing the mechanical accuracy of an action, but in practice they’re good for little else in terms of practicality. You do not fire a weapon the same way from a bench rest the same as you would naturally from the prone.

IMG_0888
Meet Fifi the Sandsock. Fifi has been around the block.

Your head and body position is different, which means your sight picture, even from optics, is also different. Along with that if you’ve laid the weapon in the rest improperly (such as resting any part of the barrel on the rest itself) your zero is now ineffective. This is the exact same as resting the barrel on a surface you’re firing from, such as a window ledge or log. A proper zero and confirmation of DOPE is conducted from the prone.

The best item a rifleman can carry to the range and on a patrol for accuracy is a sandsock. Take two old socks, fill one with about a pound and a half of sand, tie it off and put it in the second sock. Now you have a nice little sandbag that flexes to any surface you may find yourself shooting from and conforms to the weapon. It can also make a nice little neck pillow for those little ad-hoc naps in the field. They cost nothing to produce and make you more effective.

What Next?

Being a competent rifleman starts with obtaining the best zero possible. This is accomplished through solid practice of the fundamentals, understanding the mechanics of your action, and zeroing the same way you’ll be shooting in the real world. Knowledge of the trajectory of your rounds and how your chosen method of aim, be it iron sights all the way to a 4-14x44mm scope, work together is critical to repeatable firing solutions. And above all else, gaining that knowledge though solid, competent training is a must. A seasoned team of solid riflemen effectively employing the basics of good marksmanship and fieldcraft can dominate a battlespace as history has proven over and over. That rifle sitting in the safe is ineffective all alone- seek out good training and push yourself beyond your comfort zone!

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

19 thoughts on “Getting a Correct (and useful!) Zero on Your Rifle

  1. black

    i was zeroing my rifle at 100 yards a while back, POA=POI . i knew i was good out to 200. when i moved to 300 yards, i couldn’t hit my steel plate. moving the rear site up 2 clicks , just wasn’t enough. where i was failing to, take into account, was my windage even with no wind..

    at 100/200 yards the error didn’t show, but at 300. i would be just missing the steel plate. 1 click right, combined with 2 clicks up. i was then able to put 10 rounds in a paper plate, with no problem.

    but if , we don’t practice at extended ranges. we may think we know, where hits will be. but never truly know.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. anonymous

      Good point made there black, only at long distance will the shooter find out where bullet impact will be out there. Most people are too lazy to shoot at long distances because of the extra ‘hoofage’ required.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Good rule of thumb to remember, it’s not the dope on the weapon, it’s the dope behind the weapon. Sight alignment, sight picture, bone support and breath control, all come from mind numbing dri-fire practice, which will do just what NCSCOUT was talking about when he said “push yourself beyond your comfort zone”. As always a great article by a great man!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. LodeRunner

    Properly understanding and implementing the correct zero for your rifle/scope combination is the first technical step towards becoming a competent rifleman. It is the technical foundation upon which all other learning and skill must be built.

    Also, do not overlook his brief but salient comment about learning the necessary and proper use of a rifle sling – unless you expect to work only from the prone position, a good sling is essential to effectiveness (accuracy) in the field. This is another technical aspect too often overlooked by those who would be super-ninja snipers.

    The technicals are easy enough to learn, if the student will but dedicate the time and effort. The other portion of the rifleman’s foundation – discipline and willingness to execute – has been well enough addressed elsewhere on this blog, repeatedly. Discipline and willingness require patience and cultivation by both teacher and student. And of course, the raw materials must be there to work with.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. .weston.pecos.

        Right, “you need to know when and why we do certain things.” Exactly.
        And, if you look at the diagrams above, the 50 meter zero is the same as the 200 meter zero. The article and diagrams seem to imply that such a zero distance, (50 or 200 meters) would be disadvantageous compared to a 25 meter = 300 meter zero because, presumably, the 50 meter zero would have the point of impact 10 inches low at 300 yards. I guess that matters if one is zeroing for a tour in Afghanistan’s open mountain country, or for a tour on a farm field in Kansas. But as Mr. Black said above, “you need to know when and why we do certain things.”
        For me, the when and the why means the rifle gets zeroed at 50 meters.
        A. I can’t see well enough beyond 200 yards anyway, even with a 3-9x scope.
        B. The only 300 yard open space around where I live and function is at the rifle range.
        C. The 25 meter / 300 meter zero means that throughout much of the useful sight range of the rifle the shot will likely be high particularly if the intended target is prone. And, that 300 meter zero will land the shots low at 400 meters, so unless the bad guy is standing in just exactly the right spot the shooter is still likely to miss.

        This makes sense for me. For you, maybe the 25/300 zero is better. For me, it is 50/200 meters.

        Like

      2. It works for me because I’ve actually shot people and trained others to do the same. And you didn’t read a damn thing I wrote past the 25m IRON SIGHT ZERO.

        Like

  4. *Like* this article, NC Scout.

    One point I’d expand on a bit is the need to have accurate data on velocity for longer ranges. As noted in the article, published velocities for factory ammo are averages. YOUR velocity with YOUR batch of ammo from YOUR rifle may vary. At 25 yards, that variance won’t matter much, and even at 100 or 200 yards, that difference won’t matter nearly as much as the minor errors in hold, sight alignment, etc. But when you get out past 300 yards or so, knowing your muzzle velocity becomes a key bit of data; it is the basis for your drop and windage model, your “load dope”. If you have access to known distance ranges at which you can measure drop and windage at distances out to 500 or 1000 yards, great! Most of us don’t, though. *I* don’t. What I do is to zero at shorter distances, and use my muzzle velocity data to model ballistic performance at long range.

    The published data on projectile BC is ALSO an average, and it can vary from lot to lot, usually slightly. At short ranges, the difference between various maker’s 55 grain or 62 grain bullets, whether from an M4 or a 20″ HB, or a 7″ or a 12″ twist, are trivial. At 300 yards and out, though, they matter. BC can vary depending on velocity, too; Sierra publishes ballistic data which varies based on velocity. Check your load, and when you change lots, confirm your zero. Again, usually the differences are small.

    Sometimes, however, the differences are more dramatic. When Hornady developed their Amax bullet, their data was based upon shorter range data. What shooters in some calibers found out was that the real world performance sometimes varied significantly from the projected path. When I started shooting long range competitions a few years back, I got outstanding groups at 100 to 300 yards from the Amax 168 bullet, but at 900 and out, I was missing by feet, not inches. At first, I thought it was me, but I was not the only person having this problem. When I went back to Sierra MK 168s, I got good groups at 100 and 300, AND at long range too, although the Sierra had more drop and windage (Why I picked the Amax to start)

    This led Hornady to recognize that the tips of the plastic on the Amax were melting during flight, which is why the ELD bullet was developed. The point of all of this is that if you aspire to being able to make a first round hit, no warmup, at distances out to 500 yards, there is NO SUBSTITUTE for actual field performance data on the load you will use at the maximum distance at which you will employ it, under the conditions, (altitude, temperature, etc.) you will encounter. The fewer variables you leave unknown, the better. Write all that stuff down; you can learn a lot by looking at the real world results you have gotten.

    I especially like the emphasis NC Scout places upon field positions. Absent urban conflict, the likelihood that you will have a solid concrete bench from which to shoot in the field is low. Learn the 4 classic rifleman’s positions plus the “Squat” and your real world effectiveness will significantly increase your ability to make the first round hit. A good rifleman always uses a rest, when time and position permits, but…..

    Liked by 1 person

  5. LodeRunner

    “Learn the 4 classic rifleman’s positions plus the “Squat” and your real world effectiveness will significantly increase your ability to make the first round hit. ”
    ^^^^THIS^^^^ plus learning the proper use of a rifle sling!
    I suspect that BB will be offering a more detailed post on this topic in the near future.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Good write up.

    The below is what we observed while testing our Colt 6920 AR15 rifles using NATO ammo.

    For irons and red dots we recommend a 36/300 yard zero or a 50/200 yard zero.

    The 36 yard zero gives us the least amount of deviation (around 5 inches) from up close out to 300. The drop at 400 yards is around 12 to 14 inches

    The 50 yard zero keeps things a little tighter out to about 225 yards then drops 5-7 inches at 300 yards. But at 400 yards the drop is around 18-21 inches!

    If you are using a BDC Scope, then zero at the recommended magnification / distance supplied by the manufacture. Then go out and confirm and reconfirm.

    A side note, identifying a target as friend or foe without magnification gets tough at around 300 yards with good eyesight…

    Here is a link to a pretty good video describing various zeroing options: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yddJGlJo7c

    The bigger deal is a lack of training.

    Go attend an apple seed rifle shooting clinic. It will help you get better. Then attend some carbine courses. Then practice and teach others…

    Like

  7. Abram

    Looks like my tuesday mornings are booked up. 9-11 AM, the 200-300 yard range has priority over 100 yard shooting (shared range). Data knowledge vs experiential knowledge are a world apart. I learned an example of this at Survival Trial, orienteering unknown terrain with a tourist grade map in the dark for several hours, sleep deprived. An eye opener.

    Thank you for all the work you put into your blog, it’s invaluable. Also working on my Technician class.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.